Post Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2009 5:01 pm
 Subject: Her browser profile matched the culprit's...

of course, the culprit's browser profile was faked as well...
Post Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 12:30 am
 Subject: There are a LOT of pics that never made it.

Just check out the galleries. I think that's missing a few entries too...

It was all fun though.
Post Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 10:50 pm
 Subject: Re: Yes, I remember.

I was starting to wonder whether the pic from the McD from that first day was ever going to show up. Very Happy
Post Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 3:33 pm
 Subject: I am sad that you had stopped examining EXIF data by the time

we decided to start spoofing the photos with AlanS' EXIF data.

That would have truely been classic.

At least you took the bait with the faked user browser data. Wink
Post Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:45 pm
 Subject: I think Alan was a bit too obvious

Mike said he did a reverse trace (or something to that affect) of the pics posted and traced it to Emily so he totally thought it was her. Very Happy
Post Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:26 pm
 Subject: Yes, I remember.

But it went away. Did you think better of me?

Alan had me pegged from the first post but he didn't have his sequence down right. Then Emily tried to peg me but after misleading her too I was home free...
Post Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 1:52 pm
 Subject: The AlanS frame up did not work?

Post Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 12:50 pm
 Subject: Do you not remember your old 'name tag'? :wink:

I figured that it was you or Emily, though I suspected that Sarah was also involved if it was you. Very Happy

Max, of course, had NOTHING to do with it... ROFLMAO
Post Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:35 pm
 Subject: So what was going through M's head through all of this?

Mike, what was going through your mind through all of this? Who did you have fingered for the hijack? Did you think it ran this deep or traveled so far?

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group