zaneyard (Rookie)

Mon Dec 02, 2013 4:40 pm

There's no way the 300 doesn't go over 65.

They increased engine power while lowering weight. There was something wrong with it.

Post a Response | Reply with quote | Return To Forum

• Has any new 300 owner OWNED the first generation 250? — Burt, Sat Nov 30, 2013 3:03 am

  • yes I have a 86 ninja 250 and a2014 ninja 300 I like the ninja 250 better (n/t) — jvhjgh2006, Sun Aug 24, 2014 12:24 pm

    • 86 is a 0 gen — Leon, Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:00 pm

  • Bought a 300 still have the 250 — DiddyKong, Wed May 14, 2014 11:49 pm

    • Your statement is inaccurate — Ian, Mon May 19, 2014 6:06 pm

      • Thank you for the carb advise — Diddy Kong, Wed Jun 25, 2014 12:24 am

      • Carbs — SRH, Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:31 pm

    • You had a Serious problem then... — BrianM, Thu May 15, 2014 8:40 am

    • Your carbs need work — djrussell, Thu May 15, 2014 8:39 am

  • My 300 is faster, but the old Ninja liked to rev better. — Leon, Tue May 06, 2014 2:11 pm

  • Limiter? — florida-rider, Mon Dec 02, 2013 4:43 pm

  • There's no way the 300 doesn't go over 65. — zaneyard, Mon Dec 02, 2013 4:40 pm

  • Hmm? sounds like the Ninja 300 had problems. (n/t) — TonyKZ1, Mon Dec 02, 2013 8:52 am

    • gearing has changed? — MyLittleGreenRocket, Fri Dec 13, 2013 9:40 pm