Burt (guest)  |
| Sat Nov 30, 2013 3:03 am |
| Has any new 300 owner OWNED the first generation 250? |
I owned a 2003 for 75K miles. I finally rode the 300 at the IMS in San Mateo
a month or two ago and I was stunned at how slow it was. I remember my
250 as being faster when it had low mileage--as in it would run up over 90
indicated if I wound it up. The 300 didn't seem to care how high the revs
were--it didn't pull any harder and seemed out of breath much over an indicated
65 mph.
Is my memory severely faulty?
|
|
|
Has any new 300 owner OWNED the first generation 250? — Burt, Sat Nov 30, 2013 3:03 am -
yes I have a 86 ninja 250 and a2014 ninja 300 I like the ninja 250 better (n/t) — jvhjgh2006, Sun Aug 24, 2014 12:24 pm
-
86 is a 0 gen — Leon, Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:00 pm
-
Bought a 300 still have the 250 — DiddyKong, Wed May 14, 2014 11:49 pm
-
Your statement is inaccurate — Ian, Mon May 19, 2014 6:06 pm
-
Thank you for the carb advise — Diddy Kong, Wed Jun 25, 2014 12:24 am
-
Carbs — SRH, Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:31 pm
-
You had a Serious problem then... — BrianM, Thu May 15, 2014 8:40 am
-
Your carbs need work — djrussell, Thu May 15, 2014 8:39 am
-
My 300 is faster, but the old Ninja liked to rev better. — Leon, Tue May 06, 2014 2:11 pm
-
Limiter? — florida-rider, Mon Dec 02, 2013 4:43 pm
-
There's no way the 300 doesn't go over 65. — zaneyard, Mon Dec 02, 2013 4:40 pm
-
Hmm? sounds like the Ninja 300 had problems. (n/t) — TonyKZ1, Mon Dec 02, 2013 8:52 am
-
gearing has changed? — MyLittleGreenRocket, Fri Dec 13, 2013 9:40 pm